• (overall) terminological change: "RSS" into "feed".

• (Overall) TITLE: 5 different words used at the same time. Consistency required --> suggested: syndication.

• RSS needs to be developed as a separate unit (currently mixed with syndication adn aggregators).

• RSS definition: why so detailed? Propose: make it less techie, less in-depth

• more user-oriented language.

• confusing read: no clear distinction between syndication, RSS and aggregation. Use analogies, links to wikipedia -- or exercise?

• para on aggregators: should not start with what it does (reduces time) ==> what are the user needs.

• technical notes: move some more technical elements and explanation to separate section, that would be used with techie-oriented audience

• balance pros with cons/challenges (suggestions included in the original text)

• RSS should focus on production, while syndication is more about consuming the information.

• file extension -- should be in the box

• the document seems to be more useful for trainer than for trainee, because very content-heavy and dense.

• role of RSS in W2 change. More the concept that the technical history.

• Story structure: agregators -- RSS (= syndication) -- producing feeds

Exercises

• very good and useful!

 Create your own educational wiki!HelpPublic, not yet premium Privacy Policy RSS